| QUOTE (Falcon5 @ May 16, 2008 04:06 pm) |
| I just want to hear some of your opinions regarding the gas tax holiday that Senator's McCain and Clinton have proposed. In my humble opinion, I think it is a joke. I have heard the "experts" say that it will only save most families around $30 to $40 dollars. I have also heard that it would cost our country almost $800,000,000 in revenue. Most of this $800,000,0000 goes toward fixing our roads in one way or another whether it be salaries for road workers or in other ways. I guess my major problem with it is based almost entirely on the fact that over the last few years our country has accumulated so much debt. I see no reason to enact something that will only enlarge our debt and force future generations to repay an even greater amount than they already have to repay. As much as I really don't like Senator Obama he seems to be the only one who has any sense regarding this. The numbers and statements used above are from a recent article of The Week or US News and World Reports. I read the article a few days ago and I was not able to find the magazine when I started writing this. I apologize for this. The numbers and statements used above may not correlate directly to the article I mentioned but I am sure you could find the numbers and statements above in some article regarding this. |
| QUOTE (pixtaker @ May 18, 2008 04:55 am) | ||
It's only $30 or $40 dollars in savings... Next time you come through Hoxie, give me a call and toss out $30 or $40 dollars if that money isn't that important. I can find good use for it. I find it odd to hear some people explain away how the federal government has more rights to their own money than they do. Politicians in Washington can better use your money than you can? I'd like to know when Falcon5 pays his federal taxes he slips a little extra in there as well. By looking at his post...you can never tell |
| QUOTE (Falcon5 @ May 19, 2008 07:23 am) |
| I should mention and maybe one of you can ride with this. Senator Clinton has proposed taxing the oil companies more in order to make up for the loss of money if we did wave the federal gas tax. One of the magazines mentioned this wouldn't work. I am sure one of you can probably tell me why it will, though. |
| QUOTE (PTMurph @ May 19, 2008 11:45 pm) |
| I find that politicians who have been bought by the environmentalists far outnumber any politicians who have been bought by oil companies. Why shouldn't we drill in the ANWR? Don't say that even if we started now it would be years before we could use the oil. If we had started drilling when we started talking about it we'd have a rich supply now, but the politicians who are owned by the environmentalists wouldn't let us. Why has no one built a refinery in the United States in 32 years? The environmental restrictions are so tight that no one can afford to, which has resulted in us importing somewhere around 13% of our REFINED fuels, not oils. Why is 85% of our off shore oil off limits to drilling, even though that not a drop of oil was spilled when some 1000 offshore oil wells were destroyed during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita? Why has US oil production decreased by 40% since 1985? Sadly, the answer to each of these questions is nothing more than absurd environmentalists and the politicians who cater to them. |
| QUOTE (Hillbilly @ May 20, 2008 08:16 pm) |
| We also have failed to build nuclear plants or new hydro plants for the same reasons. And they are they cleanest options. |
| QUOTE (pixtaker @ May 20, 2008 08:50 pm) | ||
Being rational and being a politician doesn't mix too well. More often than not, office holders are too busy telling their constituents what they want to hear and not doing the jobs which really need to be done. But hey...they care about what is going on and they realize a problem exists, doesn't that count for something? |