| QUOTE (french543 @ January 30, 2008 08:50 pm) |
| If Dallas gives up a 1st round pick and Barber for McFadden they have lost their minds. |
| QUOTE (Boston RedHogs @ February 01, 2008 08:42 am) | ||
Why??? Because they get an immediate impact star similar to Adrian Peterson for the Vikings with a longer shelf life and potential than Barber. The Cowboys need a RB that can develop into a true threat and can compliment the Romo-TO passing attack. Barber will never have that impact. I completely disagree with you on this one. I think it would be extremely wise for Jerry to make a move for McFadden, not to mention what it will do for ticket sales. Drafting McFadden (who should have been the 2nd 2-time winner of the Heisman behind Archie Griffin, not a 2 time runner up) will put the Cowboys in the Super Bowl within 3 years. |
| QUOTE (french543 @ February 01, 2008 09:13 am) | ||||
RB's in the NFL draft are too plentiful, too many RB's in the NFL were later round picks. You can't afford to trade away a proven RB in Barber and another 1st rounder for an unproven(in the NFL) commodity. The cowboys need to look at WR and the defensive side of the ball. They might even look at F.Jones at their pick in the first to take J.Jones slot. And no, McFadden as great as he is didn't deserve the Heisman this year, it went to the person who deserved it the most. |
| QUOTE (Boston RedHogs @ February 01, 2008 04:42 pm) | ||||||
Whatever........you must be a biased ASU fan who didn't pay attention to anything other than the media hype surrounding the Heisman race. McFadden has the best chance to be Rookie of the Year (given the team that drafts him) next year and you want to possibly give that up to keep Barber and go after a WR or defensive player? I can take comfort in knowing that you're not developing the Cowboys draft strategy. Draft is all about potential, not necessarily year 1. Barber does not have more potential than McFadden. That is why Mario Williams (in hindsight) has been the better draft choice over Reggie Bush, his development and fit in the NFL Reggie was a RB that excelled with a strong supporting cast and has struggled in the NFL. McFadden, on the other hand, essentially won at least 4 SEC games by himself (without him, Hogs don't win).....not to mention blowing up LSU 2 years in a row, a defense loaded with NFL talent. Jerry is drafting potential, and he already knows that he's not making it to the Super Bowl with Barber at the helm. NO better potential in this year's draft than MCFADDEN!! |
| QUOTE (french543 @ February 01, 2008 09:08 pm) | ||||||||
No, I'm actually a fan of both teams that has the ability to see what is real. If you take off your hog colored glasses long enough to look at the numbers you will see Tebow was the only choice. As good a year as McFadden had(and it was a good one) it didn't compare to the freakish numbers Tebow put up. I love how some hog fans believe if you thought Tebow deserved the Heisman then you must be a hog hater. |
| QUOTE (Boston RedHogs @ February 03, 2008 09:53 pm) |
| My point is that to bypass McFadden, if you are Jerry Jones, so you can keep Barber and go after a WR or defensive back makes absolutely NO sense. You can talk about all of the RB's that go early that don't make it....and you're right. But what you don't mention is that because they are drafted so high, they go to the worst teams. The backs selected in the 2nd and 3rd round go to extraordinary teams so, of course, they are going to excel earlier. Put McFadden with the Cowboys, a post-season caliber team already with a considerable passing threat, and DMAC is rookie of the year. French 543. I disagree with your simplistic outlook toward RB's in the NFL draft. McFadden is a Pro-Bowl bound RB in the making......deal with it. |